|
|
Looking
down from her study at a concrete-and-graffiti London, Baroness Stern,
Secretary General of Penal
Reform International (PRI), Senior Research Fellow at the International
Centre for Prison Studies (ICPS), recently appointed member of the
House of Lords, struggles to explain how she became a defender of society's
"outcasts", its "deviants".
"This prison career just happened to me," she says. "There's
no logic, there's no blinding flash. I didn't meet anyone. I just got
into a field that brought me into contact with prisons and prisoners and
I got stuck."
For nearly 20 years, as director of the National Association for the
Care and Resettlement of Offenders (NACRO),
she ran an ongoing campaign to improve the lot of ex-prisoners. Some
regarded her as a great campaigner, others as a great troublemaker.
In a tortuous way - possible only in Britain, she says - she became
part of the great and the good, gaining a CBE and then a seat in the
House of Lords.
But, during this time, Stern's great aim, her overarching campaign, was
to cut down on the number of prisoners languishing in Britain's jails.
And in this she failed. Over her time at NACRO, the prison population
increased steadily. In 1977, when she became its director, there were
just over 40,000 prisoners in England and Wales, and just under 5,000
in Scotland.
Today, more than 65,000 prisoners in England and Wales, more than 6,000
in Scotland, and around 1,600 in Northern Ireland find themselves in one
of the UK's 160 prisons - behind bars, "banged up".
Prison reform: difficult to shake loose
Rights for prisoners just isn't popular, she explains. It's not an
issue that governments regard as a vote-winner. "There's a great capacity
for society's cruelty and punitiveness to come out when it's dealing with
its deviants. If there are people who are less popular than criminals,
I can't think who they are."
Actually, she thinks that after a decade of keen opposition to her beliefs
- that prison doesn't work, that there are alternatives to prison - it's
quite amazing that the prison reform movement even exists.
The achievement - her achievement - is that the prison reform movement
still succeeds in catching the interest of the political classes.
It's not unlikely that the need for endless struggle was what attracted
her to the cause of prison reform in the first place. The unending nature
of the campaign is also what keeps her going.
Once anyone samples the complexity of the prison system, it becomes difficult
to shake loose, she says. It's hard work. It's fascinating. You get trapped.
Breaking conventions
Given Stern's readiness to go against the grain, to risk personal
ignominy, to be a breaker of conventions, perhaps even to identify at
some level with the law-breaker, it's not surprising that she's keen to
pin down what turns somebody into a campaigning troublemaker.
Background made a difference, she says. The way her parents brought her
up certainly prepared the ground. While political campaigning wasn't in
the blood, it was all around her.
As she talks about her childhood, the genteel north London upbringing,
the public school (which, significantly, was one of Britain's few nonconformist
public schools for girls), Bristol University, Stern flaps her hand in
a dismissive way at the Millennium Dome and the gleaming glass towers
of the City of London, just visible on the horizon through her study window.
Born in 1941 to German-Jewish refugees, she was brought up on stories
about how not everyone shared her comfortable, middle-class life, and
on stories about the Holocaust.
"There was a very strong awareness of the toiling masses and the oppressed.
That was part of how everybody saw the world. It was absolutely part of
the upbringing.
"My mother would have told me from the time that I could understand
how lucky I was to be alive, to have food, to have shelter."
The knowledge of what had happened to her relatives in Germany - those
not fortunate enough to escape the Nazis - and the legacy of the Second
World War, its displaced peoples and privations, played a major part in
turning her into a campaigner.
"The carnage of the war was unprecedented, unimaginable. Humanity
sunk to such depths that everybody's perspective was that a better world
had to come out of those ashes." As a student, then, in the seditious
Sixties, it seemed natural to try to make a difference.
Becoming a radical
But weren't they the swinging Sixties? Her world wasn't Carnaby Street.
It certainly swung - but with protesters' arms and policemen's truncheons.
The Sixties' Vivien Stern - she was only made a life peer in 1999 - sounds
like the archetypal angry young student. She marched to Aldermaston to
protest at the deployment of nuclear weapons. She protested against US
involvement in Vietnam. She protested against racism, and against social
injustice.
It was a time of optimism and growth, she remembers. Money didn't matter.
It was a virtue to look for and live for "great issues". People
didn't have to think all the time about material things.
"Everyone got a job and everyone could choose a job and we didn't
have such great needs of things to buy as everybody has nowadays. It wasn't
a virtue to have a lot of things. On the contrary, it was a virtue not
to think about money at all."
After working as an English teacher, working in race relations, building
up a reputation as a campaigner, a constructive troublemaker, Stern joined
NACRO.
She describes it as a shock. One Monday morning, without any great knowledge
of the prison system, she found herself walking through a prison gate,
heard the sound of keys turning and bolts being slammed shut.
Her first feelings on entering a prison? "That it was ghastly. What
a ghastly idea. What a waste of human beings. And what a terrible thing
to take away people's liberty.
"And what a relief to get out, to be outside - and doesn't the air
feel different once you're outside the gate? And don't you feel bad about
all those who are still on the other side of the gate?"
Stern had found her vocation - her campaign.
Day-to-day campaigning
As the Seventies ticked away, running NACRO completely absorbed her
energy. She found herself working at a number of levels at once. There
was the general management of NACRO's ex-prisoner hostels where crisis
followed crisis.
"It's a field full of possibilities. You get suicides, you get people
using your hostels for a drug retailing centre or organised paedophilia."
It called for the skills of a grand diplomat. "You have this dual
approach. While trusting everyone and wanting to do good, you always have
to remember that the people you're dealing with sometimes have another
agenda."
At the same time, she had to keep an eye on what the powers that be were
up to. "One day, you discover that they're going to change the funding
rules and then you have to start lobbying."
And at the same time, she had to inspire her team, keep them working when
funds ran out, when all seemed lost.
"You're the figurehead, the fall guy, listener, enthuser. You travel
around the country finding out what's going on, reminding people that
they're marvellous. Which they are."
So what's it like running a campaigning organisation? "It's non-stop."
Changes in the political climate
But the heady, progressive era that had encouraged Baroness Stern's
radicalism was already winding down. The political pendulum was swinging
away from a liberal attitude towards criminals, the hope that they could
be rehabilitated, to far tougher policies.
Campaigning became increasingly difficult. Simply holding the line, keeping
the rights prisoners had won during the Sixties and Seventies, became
difficult. The turning point, the end of the liberal ethos in which NACRO
had flourished, was the appointment of Michael Howard as Home Secretary
in 1993.
Baroness Stern is scathing about the policies Howard pioneered and the
kind of thinking that went along with them.
"If you prisonise whole groups of people, all the people, all the
young men who come from a certain neighbourhood, all the young black men
from the city, all the people who have a low level of education and have
difficulty in getting a job," she says, "then it will become an
alternative society, it will create its own business networks, its drug
entrepreneurs.
"So, you've created an illegal society. Since they can't have recourse
to law if somebody breaks a contract, they shoot them.
"So everybody has to be armed and you create a wilderness. And then
the rest of you feel that it's very dangerous and people start living
away from those areas and putting a wall around their houses and having
a security guard. And everybody ends up in a prison."
It makes her angry, she says. But it also makes her continue with the
struggle. "You feel that you can't get old and die, because people
just don't learn."
A campaigner's work is never done
Stern leans forward and tries to explain what this means on a practical
level. "So, what can you learn from all this? You can learn that a
job is never done. It's a permanent part of life, because each generation
will see it differently and you'll have to tell them again why it's not
a good thing."
It's not all bad. Watching that pendulum swing, Stern says that she always
thought that one of her most important tasks was to ensure that lots of
"young people and the next generation and the next generation after
that" came into the prison reform field to keep it going.
Today, she sees the political pendulum swinging back in her favour, back
towards those like her who think that there are alternatives to prison.
She's watching it swing back to her fundamental values - the values of
her childhood.
She says she's happy to see that young people are no longer quite so keen
to work in City jobs that pay large bonuses but leave them spiritually
poor.
"After the protests in Seattle, I felt a sense of familiarity, that
once again people have decided that if they don't succeed in reclaiming
the world, then people who really don't care about the world will succeed
in eating it all up."
home|
article index | about
| contact
© 2000 to 2002 Hash
reproduction of material without written permission
is strictly no go.
icons
by Zeldman.
|